<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.qualitylogic.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Printer and MFP Testing Blog - All Comments</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/printer/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: ABC’s of ISO Toner and Ink Yield Standards</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/printer/archive/2009/02/12/abc-s-of-iso-toner-and-ink-yield-standards.aspx#1109</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:21:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76bb19a6-64af-4933-80d2-e772e71f83b8:1109</guid><dc:creator>Steve Gruenbauer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Problem of both standards is, that not many of the customers are printing in the way the new (and old) standards assume. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, yes, you can compare ink printers of different manufacturers with each other when it comes to continously printing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the average customer prints in batches and there you have the printer&amp;#39;s self cleaning process kicking in. The yield therefore also depends on how efficient the printer&amp;#39;s self cleaning process is and how often it is performed by the printer. Unfortunately those characteristics vary heavily from manufacturer to manufacturer and even from printer to printer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, no, even with the new standards you can&amp;#39;t compare the printers with each other when it comes to real life printing duties.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.qualitylogic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1109" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: ABC’s of ISO Toner and Ink Yield Standards</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/printer/archive/2009/02/12/abc-s-of-iso-toner-and-ink-yield-standards.aspx#1071</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:58:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76bb19a6-64af-4933-80d2-e772e71f83b8:1071</guid><dc:creator>Dave Jollota</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, if you get 3500 pages with 5% coverage, you can assume 1750 at 10%. However, the ISO standards do not talk about coverage, but rather focus on real world pages. If you look closely now at OEM claims, most are now following ISO giving you an apples to apples comparision for the first time!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.qualitylogic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1071" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: ABC’s of ISO Toner and Ink Yield Standards</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/printer/archive/2009/02/12/abc-s-of-iso-toner-and-ink-yield-standards.aspx#1061</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:09:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76bb19a6-64af-4933-80d2-e772e71f83b8:1061</guid><dc:creator>rich faber</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is the relationship of yield and coverage linear? Will you get 7000 prints at 2.5% as well as 3500 at 5%, 1750 at 10%?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do OEMs put limits on yields less than 5% so you get say only 4200 prints and not 7000? Is this a function of the cost of the printer? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.qualitylogic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1061" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: PDF/A, DICOM, and XHTML-Print</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/printer/archive/2008/12/01/pdf-a-dicom-and-xhtml-print.aspx#586</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:31:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76bb19a6-64af-4933-80d2-e772e71f83b8:586</guid><dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We still use your IPP Expert Test Suite on a daily basis. &amp;nbsp;We are just waiting on an update to be able to test on Windows XP or newer and the new IPP 2.0/2.1 specs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.qualitylogic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=586" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: QualityLogic Announces Web Site For Cost Of Ink</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/printer/archive/2009/02/12/qualitylogic-announces-web-site-for-cost-of-ink.aspx#573</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 05:39:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76bb19a6-64af-4933-80d2-e772e71f83b8:573</guid><dc:creator>Multifunction Printers </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;QualityLogic (www.qualitylogic.com), a provider of leading-edge QA and QC test tools and services for the imaging and telecom industries, today announced that it has created a new web site to publish printer cost of ink per page based on testing performed using ISO Yield standards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.qualitylogic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=573" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>