<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.qualitylogic.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Fax and Telecom Testing Blog - All Comments</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/fax/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Version 3 of T.38 — It's Likely to be in Your Future</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/fax/archive/2008/09/24/version-3-of-t-38-it-s-likely-to-be-in-your-future.aspx#590</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:31:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76bb19a6-64af-4933-80d2-e772e71f83b8:590</guid><dc:creator>FM</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You are correct that everyone wants it, but there are so few actual solutions available. I am totally amazed that Cisco hasn&amp;#39;t released anything, and don&amp;#39;t seem to have it on any public timeline, and I knew they were working on it before even your article was published. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.qualitylogic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=590" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Fax Transmission Power — More Is Not Always Better</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/fax/archive/2008/10/08/fax-transmission-power-more-is-not-always-better.aspx#380</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:42:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76bb19a6-64af-4933-80d2-e772e71f83b8:380</guid><dc:creator>...</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.qualitylogic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=380" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What is NSF... and why should I care?</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/fax/archive/2008/10/23/what-is-nsf-and-why-should-i-care.aspx#289</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76bb19a6-64af-4933-80d2-e772e71f83b8:289</guid><dc:creator>Steve Underwood</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of business FAXing is between people is small closed groups. They may well all use the same model of FAX machine. In those situations I assume most FAXes exchange in a non-standard way, unless there is T.38 somewhere in the call path. I have no idea what percentage of FAX calls might fall into that category.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.qualitylogic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=289" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Fax Conformance vs. Interoperability — How do you strike the balance?</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/fax/archive/2008/09/18/fax-conformance-vs-interoperability-how-do-you-strike-the-balance.aspx#288</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:22:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76bb19a6-64af-4933-80d2-e772e71f83b8:288</guid><dc:creator>Steve Underwood</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was ranting about this very topic today (&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.soft-switch.org/ramblings"&gt;www.soft-switch.org/ramblings&lt;/a&gt;) and a quick Google in passing brought me here. Its good to see someone writing on these topics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.qualitylogic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=288" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Fax Transmission Power — More Is Not Always Better</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/fax/archive/2008/10/08/fax-transmission-power-more-is-not-always-better.aspx#287</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:20:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76bb19a6-64af-4933-80d2-e772e71f83b8:287</guid><dc:creator>Steve Underwood</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t think they clearly define the point at which that 0dB to -43dB range is to be measured. In the PCM network a V.29 or V.17 modem clips (no subtle distortion but hard clipping) above about -3dBm0. The V.29 spec says the modem should turn off below -26dB. The FAX specs say FAX should work down to -43dB, and don&amp;#39;t actually say V.29 needs modification in this regard. Then again, there&amp;#39;s a lot those specs don&amp;#39;t say.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.qualitylogic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=287" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What is NSF... and why should I care?</title><link>http://community.qualitylogic.com/blogs/fax/archive/2008/10/23/what-is-nsf-and-why-should-i-care.aspx#261</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:29:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76bb19a6-64af-4933-80d2-e772e71f83b8:261</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great explanation. Can you estimate the percentage of faxes sent via non-standard protocols? I would guess it is pretty small, considering the wide range of devices in the market.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is that so? Do you know of other non-standard protocols that are published beside that of Adobe?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.qualitylogic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=261" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>